Evaluation of the Computer-Based Intervention Program Stayingfit Brazil to Promote Healthy Eating Habits: The Results from a School Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

Brito Beck da Silva, Karine, Naiá Ortelan, Sheila Giardini Murta, Isabel Sartori, Ricardo David Couto, Rosemeire Leovigildo Fiaccone, Maurício Lima Barreto, Megan Jones Bell, Craig Barr Taylor, and Rita de Cassia Ribeiro-Silva

Evaluation of the Computer-Based Intervention Program Stayingfit Brazil to Promote Healthy Eating Habits: The Results from a School Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

Physical Inactivity

Brito Beck da Silva, Karine, Naiá Ortelan, Sheila Giardini Murta, Isabel Sartori, Ricardo David Couto, Rosemeire Leovigildo Fiaccone, Maurício Lima Barreto, Megan Jones Bell, Craig Barr Taylor, and Rita de Cassia Ribeiro-Silva
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 10 (2019): 1674

2019BrazilOnline ProgramRandomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

Population Reference Bureau

1875 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Suite 520
Washington, D.C. 20009

+1.800.877.9881
YouthandNCDs@prb.org

© 2024 Population Reference Bureau. All Rights Reserved.

Toshiko Kaneda of Population Reference Bureau (PRB); Sophia Magalona and Lara Nazmi Mohd of Johns Hopkins University; and Lara Adekunle, Halle Gill, Grace Khaner, Maisy Liles, Anna Strunjas, and Isabel Vlahakis, current and former PRB interns from Georgetown University, produced the content of this website. Anneka Van Scoyoc (PRB) created the website and Raquel Wojnar (PRB) provided editorial review.

This website was funded by the AstraZeneca Young Health Programme (YHP). YHP is a disease prevention program with a unique focus on adolescents. It was founded in partnership with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Plan International, with local NGO partners implementing YHP programs on the ground. The YHP mission is to positively impact the health of adolescents in marginalized communities worldwide through research, advocacy, and on-the-ground programs focused on NCD prevention.

Top arrow icon

About Passages

Older adolescents’ sexual and reproductive health behaviors vary based on an individual’s geographic setting in rural or urban areas, practice of polygamy, and couple and community education levels.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

What are social norms?

Older adolescents’ use of family planning methods, especially for spacing births, depend on a number of factors, which may affect men and women differently. Examples of factors that may be associated with variations in use of family planning for spacing births are:

The following factors have been categorized into the most relevant level of the socio-ecological framework1 for simplicity, although elements of each factor may be relevant to more than one category.

Individual

  •  Religion2
  • Migrant vs resident husbands3
  • Nomadic pastoralist women vs semi-nomadic pastoralist women4

Interpersonal

  • Couple and Community Education5
  • Polygamy6
  • Couple and Community Socio-economic Status7

Community
• Post-conflict Settings8
• Geographic Setting (Urban and Rural)9